![]() Thus, it is lawful only if the police have reasonable suspicion that the individual has committed or is committing a crime, as it is a seizure without an arrest warrant. In this part, I’ll discuss the allowable scope of Terry stops and Terry frisks in other words, what police officers can and cannot do by law under the Terry Doctrine.įirst off, a Terry stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Police officers can also frisk the outer clothing of individuals they have stopped if they have reasonable suspicion that the individual is armed and dangerous, again, without a warant. In short, the Terry Doctrine allows police officers to stop individuals if they have reasonable suspicion that the individual has committed or is committing a crime, notably without a warrant. ![]() Before reading this, I highly suggest reading the first part of this two-part series called “The Terry Doctrine, Part 1: Warrantless Frisks & Seizures,” where I’ve explained what the Terry Doctrine is and how it is justified under the law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |